Thank you Dr. Adekunle for your work on Intellectnomics.
This was another insightful read and it is clear that a lot of research and thought went into this piece. The term Intellectnomics that you have coined makes a lot of sense now. I was able to connect some of the ideas listed here to the GMS 200 course, such as regarding the topic of intellectual property rights. I realized how much we undervalue subjects like philosophy, music, and the arts, even though they play a major role in shaping innovative thinkers. Additionally, the emphasis on continuous learning really resonated with me because being open to new knowledge is essential for both personal and professional growth in today's evolving world.
Also, I like the photo you included with the caption: "Documentation: An important part of Intellectnomics." It was a great addition that reinforced the importance of preserving and sharing knowledge.
Thanks again, and I look forward to reading more of your Substack posts!
Thank you for sharing the idea of Intellectnomics.
Intellectnomics, stresses the balance between guarding intellectual property and ensuring it serves public welfare without being unfair. A significant challenge in intellectual property rights lies in guaranteeing fair compensation and recognition for contributions while addressing ethical considerations and public welfare.For instance, In music, while sampling can enhance a piece's value, it often leaves original creators uncompensated. The exploitation of patents, like the exorbitant pricing of Daraprim and anti-retroviral drugs, highlights the ethical challenges in the pharmaceutical industry
I believe, Intellectnomics can offer a solution by bridging the gap between intellectual property and entrepreneurship, advocating for a framework that recognizes, safeguards, and fairly rewards contributions without damaging the greater good
Thank you for your explanation and exploration of intellectnomics. I had not heard of the term intellectnomics before reading this article, but after reading this I have a good understanding of the concept. I enjoyed reading about your exploration of this concept through different lenses especially when discussing this concept with music. I found this interesting as I never truly thought about how music is often influenced from what the musician has heard before. These musicians very rarely state their sources and typically they don’t realize that they were influenced when making their music. For something like music I believe that there is no need to add sources unless you are taking already made music and putting it in. Furthermore musicians should always compensate other musicians when they have covered music or remade music that have become popular years after. This is where there is a grey area for when you need to source and the concept you have coined really is a great way to further explain this.
The discussion of education is something I also found interesting. As someone who has just finished their Undergraduate degree and is looking to go back to school for a graduate degree I understand tremendously how expensive school is. When I did my Undergraduate degree I only took the courses that were required of me, but if school was relatively free I would be more inclined to take courses that would further my education in another way. I wouldn’t have taken philosophy courses as they weren’t required for my degree but in the event that they were free I would’ve taken them to add to my education.
Overall this article has made me think more about intellectnomics and how it can affect my own life and the world in many different ways!
Thank you for this exploration of this discussion! There is so much complexity regarding an individual's fair claim to their creation as you must take into account their sources as well, whilst being sure not to discourage innovation (necessary and inevitable). This is a valuable resource in highlighting the practical implications of placing a monopoly on knowledge, a dimension I had hardly considered while occupied with the presently rich discussion of the ethics surrounding this topic.
Your question regarding the disincentive provided by expensive education makes me think about the state of higher education that has been present throughout history. As you said, the future is knowledge based. Even now, our present lends increasing accessibility to information that was previously restricted to those who could pay for it; the exclusivity that our educational institutions have exhibited seldom holds the power it used to. How do we now fairly compensate 'original' creators when ownership is dispersed over the collective?
Thanks for the comments Grace. On the issue of education, it's a public good and should be accessible and inclusive. If we agree that knowledge is owned by the collective, then the contributors may decide how they want to distribute compensation.
Thank you for sharing this, which acknowledges the era of a knowledge-based society. It will help people to understand the power of intellectual property and the importance of giving credit to the owners of an idea.
Thank you for sharing with us what intellectnomics research group is all about and that there is more to Intellectual Property Rights than we’ve been made to believe.
Thanks for developing this concept of intellectnomics so that we can better consider the entrepreneurship and property rights associated with such non-corporeal rights. I'm wondering how does this relate to AI instruments like Chat-Gpt.
AI is function of the data, the intelligence of the developer, and relevance to the phenomenon it intends to analyze. In other words, an appropriate use of AI will only be attained by entrepreneurs who understand the attributes of intellectual property.
Thank you Dr. Adekunle for your work on Intellectnomics.
This was another insightful read and it is clear that a lot of research and thought went into this piece. The term Intellectnomics that you have coined makes a lot of sense now. I was able to connect some of the ideas listed here to the GMS 200 course, such as regarding the topic of intellectual property rights. I realized how much we undervalue subjects like philosophy, music, and the arts, even though they play a major role in shaping innovative thinkers. Additionally, the emphasis on continuous learning really resonated with me because being open to new knowledge is essential for both personal and professional growth in today's evolving world.
Also, I like the photo you included with the caption: "Documentation: An important part of Intellectnomics." It was a great addition that reinforced the importance of preserving and sharing knowledge.
Thanks again, and I look forward to reading more of your Substack posts!
Thanks for the feedback. I will release another interesting essay before the end of the month.
Sounds exciting! Looking forward to the essay!
Thank you for sharing the idea of Intellectnomics.
Intellectnomics, stresses the balance between guarding intellectual property and ensuring it serves public welfare without being unfair. A significant challenge in intellectual property rights lies in guaranteeing fair compensation and recognition for contributions while addressing ethical considerations and public welfare.For instance, In music, while sampling can enhance a piece's value, it often leaves original creators uncompensated. The exploitation of patents, like the exorbitant pricing of Daraprim and anti-retroviral drugs, highlights the ethical challenges in the pharmaceutical industry
I believe, Intellectnomics can offer a solution by bridging the gap between intellectual property and entrepreneurship, advocating for a framework that recognizes, safeguards, and fairly rewards contributions without damaging the greater good
Thanks Mahbuba. Your contributions are very insightful.
Thank you Professor, for your encouragement.
Thank you for your explanation and exploration of intellectnomics. I had not heard of the term intellectnomics before reading this article, but after reading this I have a good understanding of the concept. I enjoyed reading about your exploration of this concept through different lenses especially when discussing this concept with music. I found this interesting as I never truly thought about how music is often influenced from what the musician has heard before. These musicians very rarely state their sources and typically they don’t realize that they were influenced when making their music. For something like music I believe that there is no need to add sources unless you are taking already made music and putting it in. Furthermore musicians should always compensate other musicians when they have covered music or remade music that have become popular years after. This is where there is a grey area for when you need to source and the concept you have coined really is a great way to further explain this.
The discussion of education is something I also found interesting. As someone who has just finished their Undergraduate degree and is looking to go back to school for a graduate degree I understand tremendously how expensive school is. When I did my Undergraduate degree I only took the courses that were required of me, but if school was relatively free I would be more inclined to take courses that would further my education in another way. I wouldn’t have taken philosophy courses as they weren’t required for my degree but in the event that they were free I would’ve taken them to add to my education.
Overall this article has made me think more about intellectnomics and how it can affect my own life and the world in many different ways!
Mackenzie. Thanks for the excellent explanation of your impressions about the essay and the term - Intellectnomics.
Thank you for this exploration of this discussion! There is so much complexity regarding an individual's fair claim to their creation as you must take into account their sources as well, whilst being sure not to discourage innovation (necessary and inevitable). This is a valuable resource in highlighting the practical implications of placing a monopoly on knowledge, a dimension I had hardly considered while occupied with the presently rich discussion of the ethics surrounding this topic.
Your question regarding the disincentive provided by expensive education makes me think about the state of higher education that has been present throughout history. As you said, the future is knowledge based. Even now, our present lends increasing accessibility to information that was previously restricted to those who could pay for it; the exclusivity that our educational institutions have exhibited seldom holds the power it used to. How do we now fairly compensate 'original' creators when ownership is dispersed over the collective?
Thanks for the comments Grace. On the issue of education, it's a public good and should be accessible and inclusive. If we agree that knowledge is owned by the collective, then the contributors may decide how they want to distribute compensation.
Thanks for sharing this information on Intellectnomics. Keep it up prof 👍
RascoJet! Thanks for the comments. This is my way of advancing knowledge from my little corner.
Thank you for sharing this, which acknowledges the era of a knowledge-based society. It will help people to understand the power of intellectual property and the importance of giving credit to the owners of an idea.
Thanks for the comments. Please share with your network.
Thank you for sharing with us what intellectnomics research group is all about and that there is more to Intellectual Property Rights than we’ve been made to believe.
Thanks for taking your time to read the essay. Please share...
Thanks for developing this concept of intellectnomics so that we can better consider the entrepreneurship and property rights associated with such non-corporeal rights. I'm wondering how does this relate to AI instruments like Chat-Gpt.
AI is function of the data, the intelligence of the developer, and relevance to the phenomenon it intends to analyze. In other words, an appropriate use of AI will only be attained by entrepreneurs who understand the attributes of intellectual property.
thanks